In addition towards the primary punishment, the court might also impose a fine around the offender. The fine’s amount is at the discretion on the court and is meant to serve as an additional deterrent.

۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔

The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal hasn't challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )

maintaining the conviction awarded for the appellant reduce the sentence on the appellant from imprisonment for life to one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons acquiring their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to do absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Read more

This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mould the relief to make it correct for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision on the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

The ruling of your first court created case law that must be followed by other courts till or Except if possibly new regulation is created, or a higher court rules differently.

Electronic and paper court records retained at the court site can be viewed at the courthouse for free, however there is a fee of ten cents for every page to print from a public access terminal.

Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be made and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

When numerous websites offer free case law, not all are equally reliable. It’s critical to evaluate the credibility of your source before counting on the information.

The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case had the boy made check here a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-month report into the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

She did note that the boy still needed extensive therapy in order to cope with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Harmless with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved with the actions.

A reduce court may not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it really is unjust; it may only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. If the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the law evolve, it could both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts in the cases; some jurisdictions allow for the judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary into the determination in the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but usually are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]